← All Members

Connor Naismith

Labour · Crewe and Nantwich

FULL PROFILE

Connor Naismith is the Labour MP for Crewe and Nantwich, first elected in 2024. As a government backbencher seeking advancement, they are likely to vote loyally.

Ideology

Economiccentre-left -0.4
LEFTRIGHT
Socialmoderate -0.1
LIBERALCONSERVATIVE
Sovereigntyno data
PRO-EUNATIONALIST

Voting Behaviour

Rebellion Rate0.6% loyal
Attendance88.4%

Key Interests

Transport infrastructure and rail connectivity · Housing and tenant rights · Local economic development · Energy policy and costs · Healthcare and social care

Positions

Rail nationalizationStrongly supportive of bringing railways into public ownership

strong

Housing and tenant rightsAdvocates for stronger protections for private and social housing tenants

strong

Local transport infrastructurePrioritizes improvements to Crewe station and Nantwich Bypass

strong

Energy costsSupports government action to reduce energy prices and standing charges

moderate

Worker protectionsAdvocates for protecting sponsored visa workers from employer mistreatment

moderate

High street regenerationSupports giving local authorities tools to tackle absent landlords

moderate

Healthcare fundingAdvocates for adequate funding for long-COVID research and FASD awareness

moderate

Police community supportSeeks increased PCSO numbers in constituency

weak

Notable Rebellions

2024-12-03Voted against proportional representation reform, possibly reflecting concerns about constituency representation or party loyalty as a new MP

Reasoning Style

Constituency-focused and pragmatic, emphasizing the practical impact of policies on local residents. Uses specific local examples (Crewe station, M&S building, Crewe Arms hotel) to illustrate broader policy points and consistently frames arguments around constituent needs and experiences.

Background

Connor Naismith was first elected as Labour MP for Crewe and Nantwich in 2024, representing a constituency with strong rail heritage and connectivity. His professional background before parliament is not clearly evidenced in the available parliamentary records.